I said, "Should you be doing that without a warrant?"
Gate responded "Its an administrative search, look it up."
I looked it up and then asked Gate, "Well, the controlling opinion is a 1988 finding by the Supreme Court of Illinois in the Case of People vs Madison, and in that they quote an earlier finding that,
"...One of the fundamental principles of administrative searches is that the government may not use an administrative inspection scheme as a pretext to search for evidence of criminal violations...""
Gate responded, "what do you mean pretext, I'm just looking for some... uh...stuff..."
George adds that Gate may have cited a case that is less than national,
"Fourth
Amendment reasonableness is predominantly an objective inquiry. We ask
whether the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify [the challenged]
action. If so, that action was reasonable whatever the subjective intent
motivating the relevant officials. This approach recognizes that the
Fourth Amendment regulates conduct rather than thoughts, and it promotes
evenhanded, uniform enforcement of the law.
Two limited exceptions to this rule are our special-needs and administrative-search cases, where actual motivations do matter." (emphasis added and internal citations and quotation marks omitted).
Ashcroft v. Al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 735-36 (2011)